<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Critical Reviews of Richard Dawkins&#8217; &#8220;The God Delusion&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://talk.thinkingmatters.org.nz/2009/critical-reviews-of-richard-dawkins-the-god-delusion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://talk.thinkingmatters.org.nz/2009/critical-reviews-of-richard-dawkins-the-god-delusion/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 08:32:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://talk.thinkingmatters.org.nz/2009/critical-reviews-of-richard-dawkins-the-god-delusion/#comment-4148</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talk.thinkingmatters.org.nz/?p=1147#comment-4148</guid>
		<description>Or, here&#039;s a different sort of critique of Dawkins, written (ironically) by another Steve Hays--a professor in the Department of Classics and World Religions at Ohio University:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://oak.cats.ohiou.edu/~hays/Books/Dawkins.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;On Matter and Mysteries: a response to Professor Dawkins&lt;/a&gt; (a pdf download, but a safe one.  I promise.)  Prof. Hays&#039; theology is quite different from that of his namesake at Tribalogue.  Others of Prof. Hays&#039; writings are available on &lt;a href=&quot;http://oak.cats.ohiou.edu/~hays&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; his web page.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or, here&#8217;s a different sort of critique of Dawkins, written (ironically) by another Steve Hays&#8211;a professor in the Department of Classics and World Religions at Ohio University:  <a href="http://oak.cats.ohiou.edu/~hays/Books/Dawkins.pdf" rel="nofollow">On Matter and Mysteries: a response to Professor Dawkins</a> (a pdf download, but a safe one.  I promise.)  Prof. Hays&#8217; theology is quite different from that of his namesake at Tribalogue.  Others of Prof. Hays&#8217; writings are available on <a href="http://oak.cats.ohiou.edu/~hays" rel="nofollow"> his web page.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://talk.thinkingmatters.org.nz/2009/critical-reviews-of-richard-dawkins-the-god-delusion/#comment-4041</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 03:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talk.thinkingmatters.org.nz/?p=1147#comment-4041</guid>
		<description>Are you aware of the following lengthy review of Dawkin&#039;s new book &quot;The Greatest Show On Earth&quot; at Apologetics 315?

http://apologetics315.blogspot.com/2009/10/greatest-show-on-earth-by-richard.html

The review is summed up in the following:

&lt;i&gt;The Greatest Show on Earth is a well-written book. It is enjoyable on multiple levels. To be sure, the great majority of the content is completely unobjectionable to those who would doubt Darwinism as a comprehensive history of the development of life. Frankly, Dawkins presents the facts of microevolution very well.

But does Dawkins accomplish his overall thesis to demonstrate macroevolution as a fact? This reviewer found Dawkins’ thesis to fall short on three points: His case was incomplete, inconsistent, and ultimately insufficient to reach the doubter. Each of these can be unpacked briefly.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you aware of the following lengthy review of Dawkin&#8217;s new book &#8220;The Greatest Show On Earth&#8221; at Apologetics 315?</p>
<p><a href="http://apologetics315.blogspot.com/2009/10/greatest-show-on-earth-by-richard.html" rel="nofollow">http://apologetics315.blogspot.com/2009/10/greatest-show-on-earth-by-richard.html</a></p>
<p>The review is summed up in the following:</p>
<p><i>The Greatest Show on Earth is a well-written book. It is enjoyable on multiple levels. To be sure, the great majority of the content is completely unobjectionable to those who would doubt Darwinism as a comprehensive history of the development of life. Frankly, Dawkins presents the facts of microevolution very well.</p>
<p>But does Dawkins accomplish his overall thesis to demonstrate macroevolution as a fact? This reviewer found Dawkins’ thesis to fall short on three points: His case was incomplete, inconsistent, and ultimately insufficient to reach the doubter. Each of these can be unpacked briefly.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://talk.thinkingmatters.org.nz/2009/critical-reviews-of-richard-dawkins-the-god-delusion/#comment-4039</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 01:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talk.thinkingmatters.org.nz/?p=1147#comment-4039</guid>
		<description>Excellent catalogue</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent catalogue</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
